Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep
The deployment of National Guard soldiers on a DEA drug raid is a serious test of whether the Posse Comitatus Act means something or not.

The Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal law enforcement agencies during a large-scale marijuana raid last week in a stunning example of drug war mission creep.
The Los Angeles Times reported that about 315 National Guard troops assisted the DEA during a June 18 raid on suspected illegal marijuana farms in Thermal, an unincorporated desert community on the southeast edge of Riverside County. The Defense Visual Information Distribution Service posted photographs showing soldiers carrying riot shields next to Humvees.
The raid, completely divorced by geography and purpose from the Trump administration's original justifications for deploying troops to Los Angeles, is a compelling argument for why the president's sweeping emergency powers should be restricted.
Writing in Just Security, Elizabeth Goitein, an expert on presidential emergency powers at the Brennan Center for Justice, said the Guard's participation in the raids represents "an alarming escalation of President Donald Trump's efforts to use the military as a domestic police force."
"Based on currently available information, it appears to be illegal, as well," Goitein continued.
Goitein wrote that, while the details of the operation are still unclear, the number of National Guard troops involved and their use as perimeter security could run afoul of the Posse Comitatus Act.
The military has provided indirect support for domestic drug interdiction operations for decades, but the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 makes it a crime to deploy the armed forces "to execute the laws" except in "cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution" or an act of Congress.
The purpose of the law is to prevent direct confrontation between military personnel and civilians, particularly searches, seizures, and other coercive measures. The National Guard isn't regularly subject to the Posse Comitatus Act, since the Guard is usually under the authority of state governments, but the Trump administration's unilateral deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines to Los Angeles earlier this month has created a legal showdown over the rarely litigated law.
The Trump administration claimed the authority to deploy Guard troops and Marines under a statute that allows the president to federalize state forces in cases of invasion, rebellion, or when the president "is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States."
The use of military personnel in marijuana raids isn't just an erosion of the Posse Comitatus Act—or at least the spirit of the law. It's also an illustration of how national security tools ceded to law enforcement eventually regress to the mean of police work: busting drug dealers.
Over and over again, technology and tactics developed for the military boomerangs back to the homeland. Local police departments used anti-terrorism grants to buy cellphone tracking devices and automated license plate readers that quickly became tools in everyday drug interdiction.
When a 2019 Department of Homeland Security memo questioned whether fentanyl could be considered a weapon of mass destruction, it led Reason Editor in Chief Katherine Mangu-Ward to observe, "It's a safe bet that any expansion of law enforcement powers authorized in the name of national security will soon be used in the war on drugs."
With respect to the boss, the only thing she got wrong was in the follow-up sentence, where she wrote, "We are on the verge of being overrun by vice cops in olive drab cosplay."
Unfortunately, we're now on the verge of being overrun by men in fatigues who are not playing at anything.
"Indeed, if this use of the military were to be upheld by the courts," Goitein warned, "it is not obvious what would stop Trump from deploying federal forces to accompany almost any federal law enforcement operation—civil or criminal—anywhere in the nation, based on justifications as mundane as temperature or topography.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is it surprising someone associated with the Brennan Center for Justice said Trump's actions "appear" to be illegal?
The DNC playbook has become so stale. Especially that once their opinion is proven false and the appearance they suggested was illegal wasn't. They never retract their opinions nor apologize for misleading people with their false opinions.
At least they say 'appear' - every other non-lawyer on here just screams about how illegal it all is and then looks like an arse when the (appellate) courts uphold the actions.
Nothing says freedom like using the military to enforce unjust laws.
It's hard to believe anyone even pretending to be libertarian can still defend this administration.
it's almost technically legal...no boots on the ground...tariffs are good...Biden let them in...look what the dems made Trump do.
It's a cult of personality. Obama had it, and so does Trump. Cue up some Living Colour.
Sarc gets his personality from a bottle.
Fuck you pinko. You’re a real piece of shit if you want to let all those illegals stay.
Pinko? You know that means communist, right? Like take control of a business by government force. Like Donald Trump did. You got no room to throw that around at anyone.
Leftists did it first. That makes it ok.
Such ideas!
And sleepy Joe didn't?
Lockdowns, forced vaccinations, school closures, herding elderly people into what amounted to be death camps. Tens of thousands of mom and pop businesses shuttered. Children now two years behind in education.
Yes, the democrats know all about freedom and liberty.
Another four years of that the nation would be in a recession of worse, ...depression and possible civil war.
Fuck off and die, lying pile of TDS-addled slimy shit.
He didn’t ’take control’ pinko. He put some safeguards in place to protect our national defense interests. He isn’t trying to nationalize industries or install political officers in every corporation (Like Warren proposed).
So enough with your bullshit, pinko.
Poor Mike. He wants the libertarian paradise of Obama. Wants us to fund the world through taking taxes. Wants other countries advantaged through tariff policy. Wants Marxist open borders.
Youre so libertarian when democrats aren't able to fuck the nation up Mike. So brave. So stunning.
It is amazing watching someone who defended every legal attack on Trump, conservatives and lawyers.... defended felony charges and no bail for non violent j6ers... defends taxpayer funds on illegals... is upset NGO banks were shut down... demands federal funding for his job through graft with 60% overhead... pretend to be a libertarian when he always stans for Democrats.
But it works on other democrats doing the same like sarc.
Of course we know your favorite freedom is transing and sexualizing kids. Good work Mike.
Trump and Obama raid mj farms, check
T and O use government to take golden shares; check.
T & O levy tarrifs by executive order; check.
T&O sign trillion dollar relief packages promising great things to come, misery follows ; check.
T&O attack countries without Congressional approval , check
Wait is Donald Trump secretly a Kenyan Muslim?
Get reamed with a barb-wire wrapped broomstick, TDS-addled steaming pile of shit.
You’re so desperate, aren’t you pinko?
It's telling that there were no defenses offered, only retaliatory personal attacks. Jesse in particular is ranting with a conflation of anyone that criticized Trump which is causing nonsensical confabulation further discrediting his reputation. He has nothing left but lies.
Jesse, I challenge you to provide evidence to back up a single of those false accusations. I literally support none of those.
Jesse and company couldn't make an honest debate if you put a gun to their heads. All they know how to do is argue with the voices in those heads.
Seethe harder bitch, you lost.
People defend legal "attacks" on Trump and his lawyers because they keep breaking the law. Not too many non-violent J6 thugs arrested. Those denied bail were obvious flight risks who often publicly professed their intentions to continue their criminal behavior. People who tell the judge they're proud of their actions and eager to do it again don't get bail.
What laws did Trump break?
They aren't enforcing laws no matter how many times you lie about it. They are protecting federal employees and buildings.
That's a distinction with zero difference.
You're a TDS-addled lying pile of shit.
That’s a stupid thing for you to say. But then, you’re incredibly stupid.
Decent people will get out of the national guard as quickly as they can. Likewise other military careers. Likewise police. (One could reasonably argue that they've been doing it for a long time, or should have.)
What that leaves is the worst of the worst, willing to perform whatever brutality the dictator commands.
Police departments don't tolerate decent people. And they're the standing army the Founders cautioned us about. The military rejects the kind of people who become career police officers. Psychopathy and depraved indifference are not welcome in the military, but they're requirements for law enforcement.
Reminder. Sarc does respect cops who shoot unarmed women.
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
Whatever happened to "Just do what the cos say!"? She was in some place she had no business being, ignoring multiple orders, and advancing, not retreating.
Great. So when democrats commit insurrection when obstructing ICE, they’re free to put down the rioters at will? Ok.
That should thin out your numbers pretty quickly.
I knew many young men who enlisted into the national Guard during the Viet Nam war years. One of my cousins was in the guard.
It kept you out of Viet nam.
In other words, you’re just angry that Trump is actually enforcing the law, and you’re a whiny, impotent little crybaby sky boy bitch.
Eh, comrade?
The LP candidate got 0.4% of the vote in 2024. Keep up the good work. Never change, never learn from the negative consequences of your stances. And by all means, wear a leather jacket in 2025. So fuckin edgy.
Ah, the Sheep Theory of political debate. If your ideas are unpopular, abandon them and follow the crowd. That sounds edgy too.
Doubling down on a .4% strategy works great.
How much drugs did we get, and how many dealers were busted?
Let's go find out.
Oh ho, forget the drugs! YOU WERE LYING FROM THE VERY START!
Guess what I just found out about this highly misleading JoUrNaLiSm claptrap. It had nothing to do with Posse Comitatus or military policing. Nor does it have anything to do with drugs.
You tried to make it about the weed, Ceej (Lizzy Goiten is misrepresenting the issue too) - but it wasn't about the weed.
It was about the illegals. And the 9th Circuit - the 9th Circuit!!!!!! - has already said this is OK to continue. (At least for now.)
The Guard is there to protect, not police.
based on justifications as mundane as temperature or topography.
"787 acres and took place in temperatures up to 112 degrees."
Mundane?
That's over 600 football fields! And they're all wearing full gear, tac, and out there doing physical exertion in heat stroke conditions.
*taps the sign*
Oh, and you forgot to mention the GREAT ENDING to this story.
This raid nabbed 70+ illegals. Guard had no part in that. They just backed up the good guys arresting the bad guys.
ICE officers are heroes.
Everything is so terrible and unfair!
Would any veterinarians out there let me know when his balls drop?
Should we take any particular note of your interest in his sexual maturity?
Should we take any particular note of your snarky, inane comments?
I think this is a little over the top. Using the national Guard for a drug raid is misuse of funds and troops.
The Guard has been and will continue to be used for aid when natural disasters strike and help is needed.
Drug raids should be in the purview of the DEA and local law enforcement, that is, unless violent resistance is encountered, even then SWAT teams can be deployed.
But what about the Joooooossss John?