Aspiring Barbers and Cosmetologists in Iowa Can Now Learn on the Job Instead of Paying Thousands for Classes
A new law creates an apprenticeship program allowing unlicensed Iowans to make an income from providing cosmetology and barbering services.

Nearly 20 percent of Iowans must obtain an occupational license before they can work. A new law is lowering barriers to employment in the Hawkeye State.
Last week, Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed House File 711 into law, creating an apprenticeship program that allows unlicensed individuals to provide cosmetology and barbering services under the supervision of someone who is licensed and after completing two hours of education on sanitation rules. Businesses that participate in this program are required to register with the state's Board of Barbering and Cosmetology Arts and Sciences and comply with safety and sanitation requirements. Consumers must also receive written disclosure that the services are performed by an unlicensed provider partaking in an establishment training program.
The enactment of this bill will significantly reduce the barriers to working in Iowa's barbering and cosmetology industries. Under previous regulations, an individual required a license before making an income from providing salon and barbering services. But to obtain a license, one had to first graduate from a board-approved cosmetology program (with an average tuition of $19,508), complete 1,550 hours of supervised practice, and pass an examination—all to enter a profession in which half make less than $25,990 a year, according to the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit public interest law firm.
But now unlicensed employees will have the opportunity to immediately earn income while learning how to cut, color, shampoo, and style hair under licensed cosmetologists who own the establishment training programs. These business owners, rather than a board-approved school, are "responsible for ensuring education, training, skills, and competence of persons who provide services in the owner's establishment." And while those in the program may use the experience to take the licensing exam and obtain a license after completing 2,000 hours of supervised practice, it is not a requirement to continue working.
Iowa's barbering and cosmetology industries are divided on the impact the legislation will have. Kristen Van Hauen, a stylist and hair salon owner, told WHO-13, the local NBC affiliate, that "giving people the opportunity to just start doing hair, [is] not going to help strengthen our industry as a whole." She's also concerned that the professionalism of the industry will be diminished. But others disagree. Lindsey Mollenhauer, another hair salon owner, believes the law will offer more specialized education opportunities. "If anyone had a bad haircut, which a lot of us have. I think we need to consider that it was given by a licensed cosmetologist or a licensed barber," she told WHO-13. "So, the license doesn't necessarily speak to quality or craftsmanship."
The Professional Beauty Association (PBA), a membership organization for beauty professionals, opposed the Iowa legislation, along with a similar deregulatory bill in Arizona that failed earlier this year. The PBA's director of government affairs, Myra Irizarry Reddy, told American Salon that "the current licensing process ensures beauty professionals are educated in sanitation, chemical safety, and client protection." Lowering cosmetology standards and "allowing untrained individuals to provide salon services," Reddy said, would expose "businesses to lawsuits, liability, and uninsured workers."
But business owners are in a better position to know which risks they are willing to take on to meet their customers' demands. Iowa's sweeping change is a good start, and hopefully a sign of more occupational licensing reform to come in the state and across the country.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How do cosmetologists handle the weightlessness? Don't they need some training?
To say nothing of piracy in north Africa
Pretty sure pirates learn on the job.
My wife and son both live in Iowa. Both have also been known to use an Illinois made Wahl clipper to keep my full head of hair under control. Neither have been licensed by the State of Iowa. Those LA rioters have nothing on this radical Midwestern. Breaking the law and wearing this full head of hair proudly throughout Iowa.
Do consumers have to pay for bad haircuts? Is there a pricing scheme for "professional haircut" vs "trainee haircut?" Are they provided informed consent and the opportunity for refusal to be guinea pigs for on-the-job training?
And what will we do when this ultimately hurts the little guy? Prices will go up for professionals, because the market will now be flooded with trainees who can offer competitive rates. Pay another $25 for your haircut, or get the noob who might snip your ear off.
Standardizations In Practice are not the affront to liberty that you want to pretend they are.